--------------------------------------------------------------------- Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Dry Air Mole Fractions from the NOAA ESRL GMD Carbon Cycle Mobile Lab campaign in the Uintah Basin, Utah, November 2011 and February 2012 Version: 2012-04-12 -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTENTS 1. Data source and contacts 2. Use of data 2.1 Citation 3. Reciprocity 4. Warnings 5. Update notes 6. Introduction 7. DATA - General Comments 7.1 DATA - Sampling Locations 7.2 DATA - File Name Description 7.3 DATA - Event with single parameter 7.4 DATA - Event with multiple parameters 7.5 DATA - QC Flags 8. Data retrieval 9. References -------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DATA SOURCE AND CONTACTS National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) Global Monitoring Division (GMD) Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases (CCGG) Correspondence concerning these data should be directed to: Thomas Conway and Gabrielle Petron NOAA ESRL Global Monitoring Division 325 Broadway, GMD-1 Boulder, CO 80305 U.S.A. email: Thomas.J.Conway@noaa.gov Patricia.M.Lang@noaa.gov Gabrielle.Petron@noaa.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. USE OF DATA These data are made freely available to the public and the scientific community in the belief that their wide dissemination will lead to greater understanding and new scientific insights. The availability of these data does not constitute publication of the data. NOAA relies on the ethics and integrity of the user to assure that ESRL receives fair credit for their work. If the data are obtained for potential use in a publication or presentation, ESRL should be informed at the outset of the nature of this work. If the ESRL data are essential to the work, or if an important result or conclusion depends on the ESRL data, co-authorship may be appropriate. This should be discussed at an early stage in the work. Manuscripts using the ESRL data should be sent to ESRL for review before they are submitted for publication so we can insure that the quality and limitations of the data are accurately represented. 2.1 CITATION Please reference these data as Petron G., J. Kofler, T.J. Conway, P.M. Lang, K. Masarie, W. Dube, (2012), Carbon Dioxide Dry Air Mole Fractions Uintah Basin Carbon Dioxide Dry Air Mole Fractions from the NOAA ESRL Mobile Lab using Programmable Flask Packages (PFP), 2012, Version: 2012-04-12. -------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. RECIPROCITY Use of these data implies an agreement to reciprocate. Laboratories making similar measurements agree to make their own data available to the general public and to the scientific community in an equally complete and easily accessible form. Modelers are encouraged to make available to the community, upon request, their own tools used in the interpretation of the ESRL data, namely well documented model code, transport fields, and additional information necessary for other scientists to repeat the work and to run modified versions. Model availability includes collaborative support for new users of the models. -------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. WARNINGS +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Lab-wide notes: Every effort is made to produce the most accurate and precise measurements possible. However, we reserve the right to make corrections to the data based on recalibration of standard gases or for other reasons deemed scientifically justified. We are not responsible for results and conclusions based on use of these data without regard to this warning. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Project-specific notes: 2011-10-01 The data file format has been modified to include the measurement group and, additionally, the sample collection and analysis times now include second information (e.g., 2011 03 15 23 06 12). See section 7.3 for details. 2010-10-01 The format of the NOAA ESRL data records has been changed to include an estimate of the uncertainty associated with each measurement. The determination of the estimate is trace gas specific and described in section 6 (INTRODUCTION). +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Parameter-specific notes: -------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. UPDATE NOTES -------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. INTRODUCTION A "Programmable Flask Package" was developed in the early 1990s for use in our aircraft project to collect vertical profiles of air samples. These packages (PFPs) are analyzed on the same analytical systems used for the CCGG's global cooperative air sampling network samples to measure CO2, CH4, CO, H2, N2O, and SF6. Many of the PFPs are also analzed by the HATS group by GCMS for a suite of CFCs, HFCs, HCFCs, NMHCs, and a few other species. As a quality control step, we began deploying PFPs at some surface sites in 2006. Most of these sites are tall towers, where the PFP measurements can be compared with continuous in situ measurements of CO2 and CO. PFPs are also used for the regular vertical sampling flights led by the NOAA ESRL aircraft program. More recently, PFPs have been used to collect discrete air samples in conjunction with in-situ measurements onboard the NOAA Mobile Lab to get information on a larger suite of trace gases to characterize point and area sources chemical signatures. Data files list CO2 dry air mole fractions in parts per million based on measurements from the NOAA GMD group. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. DATA - GENERAL COMMENTS CO2 is measured by non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) absorption (LiCor 7000) using a highly automated apparatus for transferring samples from the PFP. Each aliquot measured from a PFP is dried (-70C) and is preceded and followed by one of 3 standard gases used to calibrate the NDIR response. The analytical precision determined from long time series of measurements of flasks filled with dry air from high pressure cylinders is ~ 0.007 ppm. The working standards are calibrated with respect to the WMO world standards for CO2 and are on the WMOX2007 mole fraction scale. The accuracy of the scale is estimated to be ~0.07 ppm. More detailed information on the quality control for the flasks data is available on the GMD aicraft website http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/aircraft/qc.html The air samples are collected using an automated Programmable Flask Package (PFP) and a Programmable Compressor Package (PCP). Each 0.7L glass flask and the PFP manifold (0.09L) are flushed at 10L/min for at least 45 seconds before the flask is filled and pressurized to ~2.7 atm. More information on the PCP/PFP system is available at: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/aircraft/sampling.html ------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.1 DATA - SAMPLING LOCATIONS The data table includes the three letter code used to identify the sampling platform (MLS stands for Mobile Lab Studies); the latitude, longitude, and altitude (meters above sea level) of the sampling location are provided; the sampling and analysis dates are also provided for each flask. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.2 DATA - FILE NAME DESCRIPTION Encoded into each file name are the parameter (trace gas identifier); sampling site; sampling project; laboratory ID number; measurement group; and optional qualifiers that further define the file contents. All file names use the following naming scheme: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [parameter]_[site]_[project]_[lab ID number]_[measurement group]_[optional qualifiers].txt 1. [parameter] Identifies the measured parameter or trace gas species. (ex) co2 Carbon dioxide ch4 Methane co2c13 d13C (co2) merge more than one parameter 2. [site] Identifies the sampling site code. (ex) brw pocn30 car amt 3. [project] Identifies sampling platform and strategy. (ex) surface-flask surface-pfp surface-insitu aircraft-pfp aircraft-insitu tower-insitu 4. [lab ID number] A numeric field that identifies the measurement laboratory (1,2,3, ...). NOAA ESRL is lab number 1 (see http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/globalview/gv_labs.html). 5. [measurement group] Identifies the group with NOAA and INSTAAR that makes the actual measurement. See Section 5 (UPDATE NOTES) for details. (ex) ccgg hats arl sil 6. [optional qualifiers] Optional qualifier(s) may indicate data subsetting or averaging. Multiple qualifiers are delimited by an underscore (_). A more detailed description of the file contents are included within each data file. (ex) event All measurement results for all collected samples (discrete (flask) data only). hour_#### Computed hourly averages for the specified 4-digit year (quasi-continuous data only) day Computed daily averages (quasi-continuous data only) month Computed monthly mean values ------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.3 DATA - EVENT WITH SINGLE PARAMETER The data files "/ftp/ccg/campaign/mls/Utah2012/" use the following naming scheme (see Section 7.2): [parameter]_[site]_[project]_[lab ID number]_[measurement group]_[optional qualifiers].txt (ex) CH4_lef_surface-pfp_1_ccgg.txt contains CH4 ccgg measurement results for all surface pfp samples collected at Park Falls, Wisconsin. The data files contain multiple lines of header information followed by one record for each atmospheric measurement of a single parameter or trace gas species. Fields are defined as follows: Field 1: [SITE CODE] The three-character sampling location code (see above). Field 2: [YEAR] The sample collection date and time in UTC. Field 3: [MONTH] Field 4: [DAY] Field 5: [HOUR] Field 6: [MINUTE] Field 7: [SECOND] Field 8: [FLASK ID] The sample container ID. Field 9: [METHOD] A single-character code that identifies the sample collection method. The codes are: A - Sample collected using a Programmable Flask Package (PFP). Field 10: [TRACE GAS NAME] Gas identifier (e.g., co2, co2c13). Field 11: [MEASUREMENT GROUP] Identifies the group within NOAA and INSTAAR making the actual measurement (e.g., ccgg, hats, arl). See Section 5 (UPDATE NOTES) for details. Field 12: [MEASURED VALUE] Dry air mole fraction or isotopic composition. Missing values are denoted by -999.99[9]. Field 13: [ESTIMATED UNCERTAINTY] Estimated uncertainty of the reported measurement value. Missing values are denoted by -999.99[9]. Field 14: [QC FLAG] A three-character field indicating the results of our data rejection and selection process, described in section 7.5. Field 15: [INSTRUMENT] A 2-character code that identifies the instrument used for the measurement. Field 16: [YEAR] The measurement date and time in LT. Field 17: [MONTH] Field 18: [DAY] Field 19: [HOUR] Field 20: [MINUTE] Field 21: [SECOND] Field 22: [LATITUDE] The latitude where the sample was collected, (negative (-) numbers indicate samples collected in the southern hemipshere). Field 23: [LONGITUDE] The longitude where the sample was collected, (negative (-) numbers indicate samples collected in the western hemisphere). Field 24: [ALTITUDE] The altitude where the sample was collected (masl). Field 25: [EVENT NUMBER] A long integer that uniquely identifies the sampling event. Fields in each line are delimited by whitespace. (ex) LEF 2011 10 12 20 30 46 3108-08 A ch4 CCGG 1902.040 -999.990 ... H6 2011 11 01 08 06 00 45.9451 -90.2732 868.00 325975 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.4 DATA - EVENT WITH MULTIPLE PARAMETERS On special request we can distribute a "merged" file, which includes for each sampling event, measurement results for muliple parameters or trace gas species. A merged file does not include all information found in a single parameter data file. For example, merged files exclude measurement uncertainty, analysis instrument ID and date and time for each parameter. Thus, the single parameter data file is our most comprehensive data archive. The format of a merged file is slightly different from single parameter event file. A "merged" file will have the word "merge" in the parameter field of the file name. The file name does not inform on the number of parameters included in the file. Merged data files use the following naming scheme (see Section 7.2): merge_[site]_[project]_[lab ID number]_[measurement group]_[optional qualifiers].txt (ex) merge_lef_surface-pfp_1_ccgg.txt contains ccgg measurement results for two or more parameters for all surface pfp samples collected at Park Falls, Wisconsin. The data files contain multiple lines of header information followed by one record for each atmospheric measurement of a single parameter or trace gas species. Fields are defined as follows: Field 1: [SITE CODE] The three-character sampling location code (see above). Field 2: [YEAR] The sample collection date and time in UTC. Field 3: [MONTH] Field 4: [DAY] Field 5: [HOUR] Field 6: [MINUTE] Field 7: [SECOND] Field 8: [FLASK ID] The sample container ID. Field 9: [METHOD] A single-character code that identifies the sample collection method. The codes are: A - Sample collected using a Programmable Flask Package (PFP). Field 10: [LATITUDE] The latitude where the sample was collected, (negative (-) numbers indicate samples collected in the southern hemipshere). Field 11: [LONGITUDE] The longitude where the sample was collected, (negative (-) numbers indicate samples collected in the western hemisphere). Field 12: [ALTITUDE] The altitude where the sample was collected (masl). Field 13: [EVENT NUMBER] A long integer that uniquely identifies the sampling event. There is a group of 4 fields for each parameter and measurement group included in the merge file. Field ##+1: [TRACE GAS NAME] Gas identifier (e.g., co2, co2c13). Field ##+2: [MEASUREMENT GROUP] Identifies the group within NOAA and INSTAAR making the actual measurement (e.g., ccgg, hats, arl). See Section 5 (UPDATE NOTES) for details. Field ##+3: [MEASURED VALUE] Dry air mole fraction or isotopic composition. Missing values are denoted by -999.99[9]. Field ##+4: [QC FLAG] A three-character field indicating the results of our data rejection and selection process, described in section 7.5. Fields in each line are delimited by whitespace. (ex) LEF 2006 10 10 19 01 18 3013-09 A 45.9451 -90.2732 715.98 224059 co2 CCGG 381.690 ... ch4 CCGG 1842.720 ... co CCGG 108.320 ... ------------------------------------------------------------------- 7.5 QC FLAGS NOAA ESRL uses a 3-column quality control flag where each column is defined as follows: column 1 REJECTION flag. An alphanumeric other than a period (.) in the FIRST column indicates a sample with obvious problems during collection or analysis. This measurement should not be interpreted. column 2 SELECTION flag. An alphanumeric other than a period (.) in the SECOND column indicates a sample that is likely valid but does not meet selection criteria determined by the goals of a particular investigation. column 3 INFORMATION flag. An alphanumeric other than a period (.) in the THIRD column provides additional information about the collection or analysis of the sample. WARNING: A "P" in the 3rd column of the QC flag indicates the measurement result is preliminary and has not yet been carefully examined by the PI. The "P" flag is removed once the quality of the measurement has been determined. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ PLEASE NOTE +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ We are in the process of revising our QA/QC flagging strategy. We have 1) simplified the user (external) flag and 2) introduced internal flags. The 3-character external flag will continue to identify samples that may be used for interpretation, should be used with caution, and should not be used due to collection or measurement problems. We have reduced the number of different characters encoded into the external flag and we will soon use only these characters consistently across all NOAA GMD carbon cycle measurements. We have introduced the concept of internal flags that give the measurement PIs the ability to fully document issues associated with individual samples. We envision that internal flags will either be included with the data distribution or available upon request. We have not yet fully implemented our new QA/QC flagging strategy. If you have any questions, please contact us. Flag Description RETAINED ... valid measurement typical for sampling site REJECTED C.. rejected due to error during sample collection M.. rejected due to error during sample measurement B.. rejected due to error during sample collection and measurement U.. rejected due to an unknown error during either sample collection and measurement INFORMATIONAL ..C a minor issue with sample collection has been identified but does not warrant rejection. Use with caution. INFORMATIONAL ..M a minor issue during sample measurement has been identified but does not warrant rejection. Use with caution. INFORMATIONAL ..B minor issues with both sample collection and measurement have been identified but do not warrant rejection. Use with caution. INFORMATIONAL ..U minor issue has been identified. We are unable to identify the cause. Measurement should be used with caution. SELECTED .S. sample has no collection or measurement issues but does not represent the typical atmosheric distribution a the specific sampling location. Use with caution. ------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. DATA RETRIEVAL To transfer all files in a directory, it is more efficient to download the tar or zipped files. To transfer a tar file, use the following steps from the ftp prompt: 1. ftp> binary ! set transfer mode to binary 2. ftp> get filename.tar.gz ! transfer the file 3. ftp> bye ! leave ftp 4. $ gunzip filename.tar.gz ! unzip your local copy 5. $ tar xvf filename.tar ! unpack the file To transfer a zipped file, use the following steps from the ftp prompt: 1. ftp> binary ! set transfer mode to binary 2. ftp> get filename.zip ! transfer the file 3. ftp> bye ! leave ftp 4. $ unzip filename.zip ! uncompress your local copy ------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. REFERENCES Tans, P.P. et al., Carbon Cycle (Group Report), Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory, No. 23, Summary Report 1994-1995, Hoffman, D.J., J.T. Peterson and R.M. Rosson, eds, US Department of Commerce, Boulder, Colorado, 1996. -------------------------------------------------------------------