The U.S. government is closed. This site will not be updated; however, NOAA websites and social media channels necessary to protect lives and property will be maintained.
To learn more, visit commerce.gov.
For the latest forecasts and critical weather information, visit weather.gov.
CFC-113 Scale
CFC-113 calibration standards | 2002 Scale | ||||
updated: April, 2002 | |||||
year | prepared | assigned | residual | ||
(ppt) | (ppt) | ||||
ALM-26735 | 1993 | 48.0 | 48.0 | 0.0 | |
ALM-26743 | 1993 | 82.8 | 83.6 | 0.8 | |
ALM-26737 | 1993 | 90.0 | 88.3 | -1.7 | |
CLM-2434 | 1991 | 50.1 | 51.4 | 1.3 | |
CLM-11528 | 2001 | 45.8 | 45.8 | 0.0 | |
CLM-9024A | 2001 | 27.9 | 29.2 | 1.2 | |
ALM-33800A | 2002 | 95.0 | 95.5 | 0.5 | |
ALM-65990A | 2002 | 113.9 | 113.9 | 0.0 | |
ALM-64981A | 2002 | 46.3 | 45.6 | -0.6 | |
ALM-64608B | 2002 | 93.1 | 93.8 | 0.7 | |
std dev | 0.91 |
Note: New primary standards prepared in 2003 are not shown here. We are having trouble comparing humidified standards in Essex cylinders to dry standards in Aculife-treated alumimum cylinders. The drying agent Mg(ClO4)2 appears to affect the response of CFC-113 on ECD, but not on GC-MSD. Even with the uncertainties caused by thedrying agent, the 2002 and 1992 scales are equivalent at ambient CFC-113 mixing ratios.
